Why a news publisher's archive stopped ranking
An anonymised news/publisher site (~2,400 pages crawled)
52
Before
75
After
Illustrative teardown built from representative audit patterns, not a named client. See our real before/after case study →
News sites publish relentlessly, and the homepage and section feeds only hold the newest stories. Everything older — including evergreen explainers that should earn traffic for years — slides off the feed and out of the link graph. This publisher had a deep, valuable archive that nothing pointed to anymore. Here's what the audit found and what changed.
What the audit found
390
Orphaned evergreen articles
Explainers and guides that dropped off the feed and section pages, now with no inbound internal links.
8 of 11
Section hubs with no depth
Section landing pages linked only to recent stories, not to the definitive pieces in that topic.
Auto only
Related-article links
Related links were time-based widgets, not topical — so authority never concentrated on the best pieces.
34
Internal links to add
Links to revive evergreen articles and turn section pages into real topical hubs.
What was changed
The kind of links added
82
Health
B+
Grade
Strong structure with a few high-impact internal links to add. Acting on the list below could unlock a meaningful lift in organic visibility.
Internal links to add
Anchor: “internal linking strategy”
Placement: Paragraph 3, sentence 2
Anchor: “structural SEO platform”
Placement: Paragraph 6, sentence 1
Anchor: “build topic clusters”
Placement: Paragraph 2, sentence 4
14
Quick wins
12
Orphan pages
9
Anchor gaps
The problem: the feed forgets, and so does the link graph
On a publisher site, internal linking is dominated by recency: the homepage, section fronts, and 'related' widgets all surface the newest content. That's fine for news, but it means evergreen pieces — the explainers and guides with long-term search value — get orphaned the moment they slide off the feed. This site had 390 such articles, several of which had once ranked well.
The fix: make topics, not just timelines
The audit turned time-ordered feeds into topical structure: section hubs linking to their definitive evergreen pieces, recent articles linking back to the explainers they reference, and orphaned evergreens reconnected from related coverage. A few dozen deliberate links gave the archive a reason to be crawled again.
The result
Structural health moved from 52 to 75 as the evergreen archive rejoined the link graph and section pages gained topical depth. For a publisher, the recurring win is process: a periodic re-crawl catches the next wave of evergreen pieces before the feed buries them.
Run the same audit on your site
Free, no account required for the first check.